"Walking in Freedom, pt.1 (Galatians 5:13-25)", Will DuVal | 10/26/25

Galatians 5:13-25 | 10/26/25 | Will DuVal

Despite being one of the most beloved films of all time, the 1994 classic The Shawshank Redemption is at times difficult to watch. And perhaps hardest of all the scenes to watch, is the release from Shawshank prison and subsequent suicide of a sweet old inmate named Brooks. Brooks had served 50 years in Shawshank before being paroled. Just before he’s released, Brooks threatens to kill a fellow inmate, saying, “It’s the only way they’d let me stay.” Later in the yard, Morgan Freeman explains, “He’s institutionalized. The man’s been in here 50 years… this is all he knows… These walls are funny: first you hate ‘em. Then you get USED to ‘em. Enough time passes, you get so you DEPEND on ‘em. That’s institutionalized.”


And according to the apostle PAUL as we’ve seen all throughout the book of Galatians now, “institutionalized” is sadly a PERFECT description of what happens to so many Christians over time in the life of faith. To THIS point in his letter, Paul’s been addressing the danger of being institutionalized by LEGALISM, the LAW, RELIGION. These “false brothers”, the Judaizers, had infiltrated the churches in Galatia that Paul had planted, and they were preaching a different, FALSE gospel; the Bible says “it is by GRACE we are saved through FAITH” alone IN CHRIST ALONE - he is wholly sufficient for the task; Jesus plus NOTHING - that’s the gospel. But the Judaizers were preaching Jesus plus the LAW, of Moses; why? Because they’d been “institutionalized”, BY the Law. Paul says, “For YEARS - MILLENNIA!; 1,500 years, to be nearly exact - God’s people lived in BONDAGE under the Law. Back in ch3 he wrote, “Before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned… the law was our guardian [our PRISON guard] until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian” (vv23-25). 


In other words, trying to justify - or “bring yourself into right relationship with a HOLY God” - attempting to DO that by means of the LAW, -by following enough of the “Thou shalt”s and avoiding enough of the “Thou shalt NOT”s - Paul says “You will NEVER get to God that way; NEVER measure up. And to even TRY to really amounts to SLAVERY, imprisonment, BONDAGE under the Law”. But Paul reminded us of the GOOD news of the GOSPEL last week in ch5: “For freedom Christ has set us free!” (v1). You no longer HAVE to try and EARN God’s favor through works of the LAW, through CIRCUMCISION, cuz now ‘in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything’!” Paul says, “Christ has set us FREE from legalism; ‘do not submit again to a yoke of slavery’!”


“Brooks- you’re a FREE MAN! After 50 years of bondage, you can finally now go FREE.” “BUT,” Paul will now exhort us in the second half of ch5, “make sure you are WALKING in that freedom that Christ purchased for you.” See, you can BE free but still LIVE like a prisoner, if you’ve been institutionalized. 


And this morning, Paul shifts his focus now from the danger of institutionalization under the LAW, to the threat now of being institutionalized by our SIN. Austin noted last Sunday: these are the TWIN temptations we’ve got to watch out for as believers: LEGALISM on the one hand, yes, but LICENTIOUSNESS on the other. Dictionary.com defines “licentiousness” as “a throwing off of restraint; wanton disregard or transgression of laws, rules, or moral norms.” It’s related to the word “LICENSE”, which the Oxford Dictionary defines as ‘disregard for law or propriety; abuse of freedom’.” See, we’re still talking about FREEDOM again this morning; last week the sermon title was “Freedom: USE it or LOSE it”, but this MORNING Paul’s gonna warn us: “it’s not JUST about “using” our Christian freedom; it’s about HOW we use it”. Specifically, Paul will say, “you were called to freedom, [yes]. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh”. Don’t use your LIBERTY as a LICENSE for LAWLESSNESS. Commentator Phillip Ryken notes, “Whereas legalism demands responsibility without freedom, license grants freedom without responsibility.” (Ryken, 217) Got that? The dangers of BOTH - Parents: if you govern the house with legalism - all responsibility ZERO freedom; your kid’s 18 and he still needs your permission to use the bathroom - how’s that kid gonna turn out? Either as a ROBOT or a REBEL. Either way, it’s a lose-lose. But on the OTHER hand, if you parent by giving nothing but LICENSE - “free-range kids”, with NO boundaries - how they gonna turn out? They’re either gonna learn to parent themselves, and grow to CRAVE the boundaries that you never gave them, and ironically THEY’LL turn out to be legalists… or they’ll wind up DEAD. MY 3-year old son, Bo, with no boundaries? I give him less than 2 minutes, to find a way to KILL himself. 

Previous
Previous

"Walking in the Spirit (Not the Flesh) (Galatians 5:19-25)", Will DuVal | 11/2/25

Next
Next

"Freedom: Use it or Lose it (Galatians 5:1-15)", Austin Gooch | 10/19/25