"Covenant Renewal (Deuteronomy 29)", Will DuVal | 6/14/26

Deuteronomy 29 | 6/14/26 | Will DuVal

My undergrad alma mater, Furman University, had quite a reputation and track record for bringing couples together for the long-haul, in marriage. There was a common saying and expectation that by senior year, many of those in serious, long-term relationships would have a “ring by spring”, be engaged before graduation. When we were there, the stats were as high as ONE IN FOUR relationships, culminated in marriage; Polly and I of course contributed to that statistic, as did my in-laws Teddy and Allison just a few years after us. 

So there were all kinds of traditions on campus surrounding romantic relationships: you weren’t supposed to kiss under the iconic Belltower on campus until you were engaged, so many of the PROPOSALS would happen there. You weren’t supposed to kiss in the famous “Rose Garden” until you were MARRIED, so a lot of WEDDINGS would actually take place there. But long before the rose garden or the belltower, there were the “DTR benches” along the lakefront (and by the way, if it sounds like we went to college in the Garden of Eden… we did). But spread out along the 1.5 mile walking trail that circumscribed Furman’s beautiful lake, were these BENCHES where it was common to see couples having a “DTR” - a “define the relationship” - conversation. Countless relationships were both BIRTHED… and broken OFF, on one of those benches. You KNEW, if you were on what you THOUGHT was just a friendly stroll around the lake, and he/she asked if “we could sit down for just a minute”, that things were about to get SERIOUS: you were EITHER about to get asked OUT - not just on a date, but what our PARENTS used to call “going steady”; being EXCLUSIVE with one another; my generation called it “Facebook Official”, because if she said “Yes” on the DTR bench, then the next thing you did was update your Facebook profile to indicate you were “In a Relationship” (btw, I have NO idea WHAT the kids are calling it or doing these days to indicate relationship exclusivity… I’m not sure THEY do, and that’s probably a part of the PROBLEM with dating these days, but ANYWAYS…) - it was either THAT (“Wanna ‘go steady’?”) OR it was, “Hey, we need to talk…”. And you could usually tell which of the two it was from their body language, as you walked by the bench; is there smiling or sulking? Kissing or crying? 


In relationships, it’s important to know where you stand - to “DEFINE” it. That’s where Deuteronomy ch29 for this morning comes in, and God’s invitation to His people Israel, through his messenger Moses, to “RENEW” their covenant with Him. 


Now, I say “renew” because God has ALREADY made a covenant - “CUT” a covenant, is how it actually reads in the Hebrew, because the ancient ceremony for establishing such an agreement involved cutting animals in half, as a way of symbolically saying, “so be it done to ME, if I BREAK this covenant”; we saw God cut a covenant this way with ABRAM, back in Genesis 15 - but then God made ANOTHER covenant with Israel some 400 years later after rescuing them out of Egypt. THAT covenant, the one God “made with them at Horeb” (aka Mt. Sinai), which is recorded back in Exodus 24, is referred to again this morning in verse ONE of Deuteronomy 29, in the context of God explaining that THIS covenant - the one He’s making with Israel now 40 years later “in the land of MOAB” - is “in ADDITION” to the one at Horeb. It’s not a NEW covenant; it is a RE-newal of the FORMER one. We don’t hear of any animals being sacrificed, “CUT”, here; rather, God is giving this NEW generation of Israelites - the ones about to cross OVER the Jordan River and ENTER the Promised Land… the children and GRAND-children of the FAITHLESS generation of Israelites, with whom God ORIGINALLY made the covenant 40 years prior, but who FORSOOK his promise and REFUSED to go in and take the land when God commanded them to in Numbers ch14, and as punishment, God forced them to wander around the desert for 40 years until they all died out… but now their KIDS and GRAND-kids are finally about to inherit the Land, but before they DO, God says, “We need to have a DTR”. 


That’s what a covenant IS, in very technical, theological terms; it’s a “DTR”, a “defining of the relationship”. 

You don’t hear much about covenants anymore; we sign a lot of CONTRACTS: your CELL phone plan… your gym membership… your mortgage… your insurance policy… LOTS of contracts. But a contract is IMPERSONAL; “it’s just business”, as the saying goes. Not so, with a COVENANT, which is INHERENTLY personal, RELATIONAL. 


And which we rarely encounter anymore. I can only think of 2 or 3 modern-day cases: what are they? (help me out…) 


1) MARRIAGE. When you get MARRIED, you make PROMISES to one another… and it’s PERSONAL. You are DEFINING the relationship - no longer just “boyfriend and girlfriend”, but now HUSBAND and WIFE. Moreover, you define the TERMS of the relationship by virtue of the VOWS you make: “...for better or for worse/ for richer or for poorer/ in sickness & in health/ to love & to cherish/ till death do us part.”


2) ADOPTION. Similar to marriage, adoption certainly includes a legal contract component, but it’s so much MORE than that; it’s RELATIONAL. When Polly and I adopted Elijah, we took an OATH to love and raise him just the same as our biological children, with all the same rights and privileges, duties and discipline… “for better or for worse”.


And then the LAST example I can think of in today’s world is…

3) the covenant of CHURCH membership. We walk through this in our membership CLASS here, but once again, it is a DEFINING of the relationship. You may attend West Hills frequently, perhaps even for YEARS… you may call this “your church” and call me “your pastor”, but until you make those covenant promises - “

I will protect the Unity of my Church… 

I will serve the Ministry of my Church…

I will share the Responsibility of my Church… 

I will support the Testimony of my Church… 

” - until you “D” the “R”, and make it “official”, it’s sort of like dating the church… but refusing to “settle down” and MARRY her.   


Fortunately, JESUS didn’t do that; the Church isn’t Christ’s “BOO”; we are His BRIDE! He has entered into COVENANT relationship with His people. But this morning we’re reminded that 1500 years before JESUS took the CHURCH as His Bride - the NEW covenant - long before that, YAHWEH took the nation of ISRAEL to be His Bride, His people, through the “OLD covenant” that He will re-NEW with them this morning.


The word “covenant” appears SEVEN times in this chapter. Warren Wiersbe points out that (OT Commentary, 363): “This chapter is the book of Deuteronomy in miniature. Moses 1) reviews the past (vv1-8), He 2) calls the people to obey God’s law (vv9-15), and then he 3) warns them what will happen if they disobey (vv16-29).”

Previous
Previous

"Passing the Baton (Deuteronomy 31:1-32:47)", Austin Gooch | 6/21/26

Next
Next

“Rightly Responding to the Lord (Deuteronomy 26-27)", Will DuVal | 6/7/26